In Nithalos there is an increasing trend to contract pronoun/particle combinations into a single word (forming kinds of oblique cases). This is not considered to be a case declension since it only occurs in pronouns, and only in some pronouns. Note that this only applies to singular pronouns; plural pronouns cannot contract - ever.
an | mo | ev | ko | so | ||
ađ | "only" | an ađ | mođ | ev ađ | ko ađ | so ađ |
da | "because of" | ada | mo da | eda | ko da | so da |
vi | "from" | an vi | mo vi | ev vi | kov kovi | sov sovi |
vo | "also, too" | avo | mov movo | evo | ko vo | so vo |
eg | "to, for" | aney | mue moe | evey | koey | soey |
go | "with, by" | ago | mog mogo | ego | kog | sog |
om | "about" | aom | mom | eom | ko om | so om |
or | "for, in order to" | ar | mor | er | kor | sor |
šo | "as, like" | ašo | mo šo | ešo | ko šo | so šo |
to | "to" | ato at | mot | eto et | kot kođ | sot sođ |
us | "without" | aus | mo us | eus | kus | sus |
Where there are two in the same cell, is where the two forms are interchangeably used. Of course, the full forms can also be used; they do not have to be contracted, and in some cases, are preferred not to be. This is generally because of ambiguities that could be created because of similar words or homophones. For example,
Mo ato arkiva |
You eventually walked |
Mo ato arkiva |
You walked to me |
The two above could be ambiguous, and in the latter case, an to or even at would probably be used instead. Sometimes however, the context is clear enough that the contraction can still be used.