Tanaþekńabmi Phonology
▲
0▲ 0 ▼ 0
Tanaþekńabmi phonology according to Optimality Theory.
This public article was written by [Deactivated User], and last updated on 15 Apr 2019, 20:29.
[comments] tnbphonology
Consonants | Bilabial | Labio-dental | Dental | Alveolar | Palatal | Velar |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nasal | /m/ m | /n/ n | /ɲ/ ñ | /ŋ/ ń | ||
Plosive | /p/ /b/ p b | /t/ /d/ t d | /c/ /ɟ/ ć ź | /k/ /g/ k g | ||
Fricative | /ɸ/ /β/ f ß | /v/ v | /θ/ /ð/ þ ð | /ç/ /ʝ/ ç j | /x/ /ɣ/ č ž | |
Lateral approximant | /l/ l | /ʎ/ ł |
All consonants are allophonous with others in the same manner of articulation.
Vowels | +front | -front |
---|---|---|
+high -low |
/i/ /y/ i ï | /u/ u |
-high -low |
/e/ /ø/ e ë | |
-high +low |
/a/ a |
A well formed Tanaþekńabmi syllable has either CV or CVC structure. In affixes, non-morphological heads (morphological head: the rightmost derivational morpheme or the root if there is none), and borrowed words a C nucleus is permitted. Note: derivational morphemes differ from inflectional morphemes in that derivational morphemes change the category of a word. In no circumstances can a syllable be without an onset. Diphthongs, multi-segment onsets or codas, and vowel hiatuses are not tolerated.
The allophony is best explained in the terms of the constraints posited by Optimality Theory as opposed to the limited rule-based SPE. Allophony only occurs in whatever is not the morphological head in a word. Vowel harmony occurs everywhere except the primary stress and affects the roundedness feature of metrical feet. Infixes are malformed prefixes moved by phonological rules. Relevant generalisations are listed below:
*NUC/stop ≫ *NUC/fric ≫ *NUC/nasal ≫ *NUC/liquid ≫ *NUC/glide ≫ *NUC/VHI ≫ *NUC/VLO
Tanaþekńabmi is a stress-timed language with trochaic feet (stress-unstressed), a near exhaustive parsing (not every syllable has to be in a foot), and left-to-right directionality (creating feet from left to right). The primary stress falls on the leftmost foot of the morphological head of a word and all other stress is secondary. Relevant generalisations are listed below:
Constraints are used in Optimality Theory to pick the most optimal surface candidate out of a variety of inputs. They can either check for faithfulness to the input or markedness in the output. A constraint dominates (≫) another if a violation in the dominating constraint knocks out a candidate and another candidate that violates the dominated constraint is preferred. The ranking of constraints cannot be known (, ) in some cases. Accounting for richness of the base, theoretically any input or loanword can be transformed into a well formed Tanaþekńabmi word.
The ranking of relevant featural constraints is as follows:
ONSET, MHd-IDENT[Place], IDENT[labial], IDENT[labio-dental], ONSET-IDENT[voice], HNuc, MHd-MAX, IO-ANCHOR-R-σ, LINEARITY, UNIFORMITY, INTEGRITY, *ONS/glide, *VV, *HETERORGANIC, *DIPHTHONG, *COMPLEX, IDENT-σ́-IO(round) ≫ MHd-DEP ≫ MAX-C, OCP ≫ *NUC/stop ≫ *NUC/fric ≫ *NUC/nasal ≫ *NUC/liquid ≫ *NUC/glide ≫ *NUC/VHI ≫ DEP ≫ IDENT[Place], MAX-V ≫ *NUC/VLO ≫ ALIGN-L(Prefix, Stem) ≫ NOCODA, CONTIG
The constraints used are defined below:
Here is an example tableau showing the syllabification and allophony of the word Tanaþekńabmi /tana-θe-kini-bini/. All affixes in this word are not derivational. (Imagine dotted lines separating columns that have unknown ranking)
/√tana-θe-kini-bini/ | ONSET | IDENT[labial] | IO-ANCHOR-R-σ | *HETERORGANIC | *NUC/VHI | DEP | IDENT[Place] | MAX-V | *NUC/VLO | NOCODA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
☞ (a) .ta.na.θek.ŋab.mi. | * | * | * * | * * * | * * * | * * | ||||
(b) .ta.na.θe.ki.ni.bi.ni. | * *! * * | * * | * * | |||||||
(c) .ta.na.θe.kŋb.mi. | *! | * * | * * * | * * | * | |||||
(d) .ta.na.θek.ŋa.bm. | *! | * | * * | * * * * | * * * | * | ||||
(e) .ta.na.θek.ŋad.ni. | *! | * | * | * * * | * * * | * * | ||||
(f) .ta.na.θe.kn.bn. | *! | * * * | * * * * | * * | ||||||
(g) .ta.na.θe.k.n.b.n. | *! * * * | * | * * * | * * * * | * * |
√ = root
- = morpheme boundary
. = syllable boundary
* = violation
! = fatal violation
☞ = winning candidate
The ranking of relevant metrical constraints (FTBIN is dominated by the featural constraints) is as follows:
FTBIN ≫ PARSE-σ ≫ ALIGN-L(Ft, Word) ≫ SPREAD([round], Ft) ≫ ALIGN-R(Ft, Word)
ALIGN-L(Ft́, MHd) ≫ ALIGN-R(Ft́, MHd)
ALIGN-L(σ́, Ft) ≫ ALIGN-R(σ́, Ft)
The constraints used are defined below:
Here is an example tableau showing the parsing of the word Tanaþekńabmi [ˈta.na.ˌθek.ŋab.mi].
/ta.na.θek.ŋab.mi/ | FTBIN | PARSE-σ | ALIGN-L(Ft, Word) | ALIGN-R(Ft, Word) |
---|---|---|---|---|
☞ (a) (tána)(θèkŋab)mi | * | * * | * * * * | |
(b) (tána)(θèkŋab)(mì) | *! | * * * * * * | * * * * * | |
(c) ta(náθek)(ŋàbmi) | * | * * *! * * | * * |
() = foot boundary
á = primary stress
à = secondary stress
* = violation
! = fatal violation
☞ = winning candidate
✎ Edit Article ✖ Delete Article
Comments